Insights · Field Notes 04

Token cost: $/1M tokens? No!

Recently, my co-founder (ex-CFO, HBS) and I were talking with an FP&A team about how enterprises should measure AI costs.

The lazy answer is $/million tokens. That's what model providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) use, so teams naturally track it.

We believe different AI workflows need different KPIs:

Also, the metric you use to judge AI economics may not be the same one you use to control spend while AI is running.

Naturally, you need a control unit for the active workflow/job. But you also need a reporting unit for Finance to assess the economics after the work finishes.

Different teams will optimize for different KPIs locally. But ultimately, the single most important question engineers, ops, and finance teams need to answer is:

What did it cost to produce the outcome we wanted?

In Gateway or Not?, we go deeper into the technical details, the suboptimal approaches we see today, and what we believe is the right solution.

You still measure AI in the unit vendors sell: dollars per million tokens. Useful for the model provider, not enough for your organization.
Different AI workloads need different units: automation as dollars per transaction, product features as dollars per user, evals as dollars per eval run, agents as dollars per completed job.
While work is running you control cost per active workflow. After the work is done you report cost per successful outcome.
Engineers, ops, and finance optimize locally, but over time all three need to reconcile around the same unit: business outcome.

← All insights

Impact

What can a long-horizon agent do for your business?

Schedule a call